Taleb’s latest paper uses the DIRAC function for modeling and provides a critical analysis of the impact of stop-losses on trading systems.
In public perception, setting a stop-loss is believed to reduce risk, but mathematical proof shows this is a serious cognitive fallacy. The risk never disappears; if you set a 10% stop-loss, all the probabilities of losing between 10% and 100% are concentrated at that 10% stop point, making it the most fragile spot in your trading system.
This paper’s viewpoint further highlights the importance of position sizing, which is what I’m currently practicing (. I used to prefer rolling over small funds and going all-in ). The essence of setting a stop-loss is to use a higher probability of small losses to offset the risk of low-probability, large losses. However, this can lead to frequent small losses due to minor fluctuations and cause you to miss real trending opportunities, which in itself is a form of accumulating systemic risk.
In terms of skill trees, both the position-sized swing shorting volatility strategy and the trend-following long volatility strategy should be adopted. Traders have three types of candlesticks: the market’s K-line, the account PnL K-line, and the psychological K-line. Position sizing and swing trading help control account PnL drawdowns and establish positive feedback for mindset.
To put it simply:
If your stop-loss is set on a higher timeframe, it’s easy to get stopped out by normal fluctuations; not setting a stop-loss means you’re leaving all your risk to chance. I believe many people have experienced this: you set a stop-loss and get triggered, and then the market moves exactly as you predicted, causing you to miss a great opportunity. So you become complacent and stop using stop-losses, only for the market to move against you and wipe out your entire position.
Is there a best-of-both-worlds approach? Yes: Divide your total capital into n smaller portions. Use isolated margin for each position. Liquidation serves as your stop-loss, and take-profits are unlimited.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Taleb’s latest paper uses the DIRAC function for modeling and provides a critical analysis of the impact of stop-losses on trading systems.
In public perception, setting a stop-loss is believed to reduce risk, but mathematical proof shows this is a serious cognitive fallacy. The risk never disappears; if you set a 10% stop-loss, all the probabilities of losing between 10% and 100% are concentrated at that 10% stop point, making it the most fragile spot in your trading system.
This paper’s viewpoint further highlights the importance of position sizing, which is what I’m currently practicing (. I used to prefer rolling over small funds and going all-in ). The essence of setting a stop-loss is to use a higher probability of small losses to offset the risk of low-probability, large losses. However, this can lead to frequent small losses due to minor fluctuations and cause you to miss real trending opportunities, which in itself is a form of accumulating systemic risk.
In terms of skill trees, both the position-sized swing shorting volatility strategy and the trend-following long volatility strategy should be adopted. Traders have three types of candlesticks: the market’s K-line, the account PnL K-line, and the psychological K-line. Position sizing and swing trading help control account PnL drawdowns and establish positive feedback for mindset.
To put it simply:
If your stop-loss is set on a higher timeframe, it’s easy to get stopped out by normal fluctuations; not setting a stop-loss means you’re leaving all your risk to chance.
I believe many people have experienced this: you set a stop-loss and get triggered, and then the market moves exactly as you predicted, causing you to miss a great opportunity. So you become complacent and stop using stop-losses, only for the market to move against you and wipe out your entire position.
Is there a best-of-both-worlds approach? Yes:
Divide your total capital into n smaller portions. Use isolated margin for each position. Liquidation serves as your stop-loss, and take-profits are unlimited.