The optimization direction of the fee pool design is worth paying attention to. Some projects are building reward distribution mechanisms based on coin holding weight rather than popularity—this design allows participants' long-term contributions to be genuinely rewarded, rather than short-term hype. Meanwhile, the transparency verification mechanism at the social layer is also evolving, showcasing the actual influence of holders through on-chain data. The combined effects of these mechanisms are quite interesting: as quarterly updates proceed, yields accumulate in a compounded manner. The weight incentive model + social verification layer + periodic compounding—this combination could be an important direction for future DeFi ecosystem incentive design.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityJanitor
· 4h ago
Someone finally explained this logic clearly. The weight distribution is much more reliable than hype-driven speculation. I'm just worried that the project team might still cut corners in the end.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 4h ago
This mechanism sounds good, but how many projects can truly be implemented? Most are still just theoretical plans.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 4h ago
Well, this set of logic sounds good, but how many projects can truly be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 4h ago
Hmm, this set of logic sounds good, but how many projects can truly stick to their weight without being hijacked by popularity...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 5h ago
Hmm... That's true, but very few projects can actually be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 5h ago
It should have been designed this way long ago. Finally, someone is starting to reflect on the emptiness of the hype economy.
The optimization direction of the fee pool design is worth paying attention to. Some projects are building reward distribution mechanisms based on coin holding weight rather than popularity—this design allows participants' long-term contributions to be genuinely rewarded, rather than short-term hype. Meanwhile, the transparency verification mechanism at the social layer is also evolving, showcasing the actual influence of holders through on-chain data. The combined effects of these mechanisms are quite interesting: as quarterly updates proceed, yields accumulate in a compounded manner. The weight incentive model + social verification layer + periodic compounding—this combination could be an important direction for future DeFi ecosystem incentive design.