#美国非农数据超预期 Recently, there has been news circulating in the industry: JPMorgan and BlackRock have teamed up to launch a structured product aimed at the Bitcoin Halving cycle. The product design is quite ingenious — it packages a Bitcoin ETF into a four-year investment plan, boasting a guaranteed annualized return of 16%, and also includes a 30% downside protection mechanism. Sounds great? Don't rush to get excited just yet.
The underlying logic of such products is worth scrutinizing. They have taken advantage of the cryptocurrency community's collective belief that "Halving = Bull Market" and used a combination of "capital preservation + high returns" to lock in your funds. Looking closely at the terms: if you make a profit, the institution takes management fees and excess share; if you incur a loss, the risk is entirely borne by the investors. The so-called "downside protection" is actually a double-edged sword — fluctuations within 30% cannot trigger a stop-loss, and during a surge, there is no way to increase positions in time. Your funds are firmly pinned in this four-year cycle, and flexibility is reduced to zero.
Those who bought at the peak of the last bull market barely broke even after three years. Now you want me to bet until 2028? No one can say for sure what will happen in these four years. A policy shift, a market crash, or concentrated selling by institutions—any one of these variables could turn "guaranteed returns" into a mere piece of paper. And the institutions? Regardless of whether the market goes up or down, they still collect management fees without fail. They exchange your time cost and opportunity cost for a stable cash flow that is guaranteed to be profitable.
The value of Bitcoin lies in decentralization and transparency. When it is packaged into complex financial derivatives, the rules of the game change. If you haven't even grasped basic position management and risk control, what gives you the right to play games with Wall Street's actuarial teams?
Remember this: all opportunities in the market that seem to be "guaranteed profit" are backed by meticulously designed profit distribution mechanisms. When a product perfectly aligns with your psychological expectations, ask yourself first - who is truly bearing the risk in this game? $BTC $ASTER $ZEC
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#美国非农数据超预期 Recently, there has been news circulating in the industry: JPMorgan and BlackRock have teamed up to launch a structured product aimed at the Bitcoin Halving cycle. The product design is quite ingenious — it packages a Bitcoin ETF into a four-year investment plan, boasting a guaranteed annualized return of 16%, and also includes a 30% downside protection mechanism. Sounds great? Don't rush to get excited just yet.
The underlying logic of such products is worth scrutinizing. They have taken advantage of the cryptocurrency community's collective belief that "Halving = Bull Market" and used a combination of "capital preservation + high returns" to lock in your funds. Looking closely at the terms: if you make a profit, the institution takes management fees and excess share; if you incur a loss, the risk is entirely borne by the investors. The so-called "downside protection" is actually a double-edged sword — fluctuations within 30% cannot trigger a stop-loss, and during a surge, there is no way to increase positions in time. Your funds are firmly pinned in this four-year cycle, and flexibility is reduced to zero.
Those who bought at the peak of the last bull market barely broke even after three years. Now you want me to bet until 2028? No one can say for sure what will happen in these four years. A policy shift, a market crash, or concentrated selling by institutions—any one of these variables could turn "guaranteed returns" into a mere piece of paper. And the institutions? Regardless of whether the market goes up or down, they still collect management fees without fail. They exchange your time cost and opportunity cost for a stable cash flow that is guaranteed to be profitable.
The value of Bitcoin lies in decentralization and transparency. When it is packaged into complex financial derivatives, the rules of the game change. If you haven't even grasped basic position management and risk control, what gives you the right to play games with Wall Street's actuarial teams?
Remember this: all opportunities in the market that seem to be "guaranteed profit" are backed by meticulously designed profit distribution mechanisms. When a product perfectly aligns with your psychological expectations, ask yourself first - who is truly bearing the risk in this game? $BTC $ASTER $ZEC