The "abnormal" actions of $PING and $PAYAI: Abandoning the project or breaking the deadlock?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

The most frequently asked question these past two days: What on earth are $PING and $PAYAI doing?

If they’re not pumping the price, fine. But one MEME coin insists on launching a Launchpad, while another utility token suddenly wants to migrate and change pools—these moves look like exit scams. The market is full of speculation and anxiety.

Honestly, in this bear market, no one feels confident. But looking at it calmly, I actually think both projects’ moves make sense.

Why are these actions actually normal?

Think about it from another perspective: if the market was doing better, these moves would definitely be seen as bullish news.

What’s the biggest problem for MEME coins? Lack of sustainable value creation. They rely entirely on community consensus and emotional swings—once the hype dies, it’s a long, slow decline.

What about tech utility projects? Tools like Facilitator have a very obvious ceiling and not much of a technical moat. It’s hard to create an exciting narrative.

So right now, both projects face the same issue: a lack of fundamentals to support confidence.

And their recent moves are precisely aimed at fixing their respective weaknesses:

  • $PING is adding a platform token attribute through Launchpad, trying to build a positive flywheel
  • $PAYAI is upgrading from a tool layer to a protocol layer, expanding its potential

Both are trying to break out of their original limitations.

What’s the logic behind these moves?

Since we’re still at the blueprint stage, let’s focus on the underlying logic.

First, $PING’s Launchpad plan.

Honestly, it’s not surprising at all. In a bear market without emotional support, relying solely on the x402 MEME narrative is likely to fizzle out. But if it pivots to a Launchpad platform token? That’s a whole new story.

They can keep incubating projects—if the first one fails, there’s a second, then a third, constantly experimenting. As long as they catch a good liquidity window, there’s a chance to transform. From this angle, this strategic adjustment is quite smart.

Now, $PAYAI’s token migration.

This move is definitely prone to conspiracy theories. Many suspect the team ran out of tokens and wants to regain control through migration.

But think about it—if they just wanted to stir things up, wouldn’t direct FUD be more effective? I’m more inclined to believe the team realized the ceiling of Facilitator as a tool and wants to upgrade to a protocol layer to keep the token valuable—staking mechanisms, reward systems, ecosystem incentives, CEX lockups, and so on. Over a longer time frame, this direction makes sense.

Why isn’t the market buying it?

Ultimately, it’s a mindset issue.

Most people entered the x402 space with a short-term MEME trading mentality. Used to quick in-and-out plays, grab a pump and leave. But the growth logic for x402 is totally different. It’s not a pure MEME narrative, and you won’t see instant results.

$PING’s Launchpad is just the beginning of the x402 asset issuance narrative. It might succeed or crash, but more Launchpads are brewing. Look at the ideas popping up in the c402 Market—a new wave of Launchpads won’t just be useless airdrop tokens; Gamefi, Socialfi, and other practical scenarios can be integrated. This is a huge leap beyond simple chat mining.

$PAYAI’s protocol layer upgrade is even more nuanced.

Word is, the team has a classic engineering mindset. In a bear market, that might actually be a good thing—they have enough time to polish the product and prove their capabilities.

Facilitator as a sector has huge potential for value capture and commercial expansion. The team’s new positioning is about continuously empowering Facilitator, ultimately changing its value in the x402 ecosystem.


Bottom line, both projects are trying to break through their bottlenecks. Success isn’t guaranteed, but at least they’re headed in the right direction. In this bear market, seeing teams seriously consider long-term development instead of just one pump and dump is already rare.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DevChivevip
· 12-08 02:54
I'm also watching these two projects, to be honest, in this bear market environment, who isn't scared? But the combo of switching pools + launchpad... it's not like they're running away, it just feels like they're trying to save themselves. To put it bluntly, MEME coins never had much vitality, and PAYAI also needs a cash injection. Instead of sitting around waiting for death, it's better to try something—what if the market picks up? But what I'm more worried about is whether newbies will get dumped on during the migration process. Who dares to trust anything these days? I've never heard of a project successfully turning things around after switching pools... it's never ended well, has it?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 12-08 02:46
Who can be intimidated by a blood-red market anymore? Instead of waiting to die, it's better to take the initiative. I think these two projects are genuinely looking for a way to survive.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 12-08 02:44
Doing such convoluted moves in a bear market just makes things look even worse. Wait, a MEME coin launching a Launchpad? Is this an attempt at self-rescue or self-destruction... Honestly, I don’t understand their logic, but if they dare to do this, they must have some confidence. Both coins are stirring things up, feels like they’re trying to break the deadlock, but pulling stunts like this can shatter confidence in no time. MEME survives on hype; without hype, even more Launchpads are pointless—that’s a hard rule. Honestly, these two projects are either playing a big long game, or they’re accelerating their own demise. Either way, I can’t figure it out anymore. As for swapping and migrating pools, I’ve rarely seen that end well before.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegenvip
· 12-08 02:32
nah wait, if you squint hard enough launchpad pivots during bear runs actually make sense... or am i just coping at this point lmao
Reply0
OnChainSleuthvip
· 12-08 02:28
Wake up everyone, it's a bear market and you still think they won't run? This round of Launchpad by PING is obviously a self-rescue move. But seriously, can switching pools really save PAYAI? Feels like we'll have to see if they can come up with something new next. If the market picks up one day, these moves might become classic cases, and those complaining now will have to eat their words. There's nothing wrong with saying they lack the ability to generate revenue, but the problem is, how many coins can actually survive a bear market? Honestly, compared to running away, at least they're still trying. I give full marks for this attitude. Just hope this migration doesn't end up with nothing happening after a long wait. Really can't stand all talk and no action. Just worried this Launchpad is another gimmick to cut retail investors. Feels like there are too many tricks with this project. No matter what, taking action is better than doing nothing, but whether it survives will depend on the data.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)