The market never believes in empty talk, only in real money.
Lately, there’s been another wave of people shouting “DOT is about to take off,” but if you really do the math—at the current price of $2.09 and a market cap in the tens of billions, want it to double? That would require injecting billions more! Who’s going to put up that money? Can retail traders just shout it up?
Of course, Polkadot still has some cards to play: - Supply cap set for 2026, so the inflation issue is basically solved - JAM protocol and Polkadot 2.0 are still in the pipeline
But what are these, fundamentally? Infrastructure upgrades! Not explosive news that’ll pump the price tomorrow or make it 100x overnight. This is a patience game—you have to wait for the ecosystem to gradually grow, users to slowly accumulate, and capital to settle in over time. What’s the rush? If you really want to go to the moon, you need to build a solid rocket first—just shouting in the community won’t make it fly.
Stop using “dead project” rhetoric to bash it. DOT isn’t dead; it’s just no longer that small-cap, moonshot token. It’s now an infrastructure layer, a protocol-level player, a slow-and-steady builder—want it to grow? First look at how many real applications are running on it!
**On the other hand, the GameFi space looks completely different**
When it comes to real revenue generation, GameFi guilds like Yield Guild Games have already figured out a working business model—players earn tokens by gaming, grind for gear, sell NFTs, and directly cash out. Guilds provide resources, tools, and seed funding, so regular people can participate and share profits.
Why is this path more interesting right now? - **Tangible, visible income:** This isn’t just hype—players are really earning money in the games - **The data is growing, not just talk:** In just the first half of 2024, active wallets in the GameFi sector have skyrocketed
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApeWithNoFear
· 10h ago
That's right, retail investors calling trades can't really save the market; it still depends on whether the ecosystem has real value.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 12-08 04:54
Alright, the DOT situation really isn’t that simple. It takes tens of billions to double, who would dare to take that on?
What’s truly interesting is still on the chain gaming side. Models like YGG have proven to work—players really are making money, it's not just hype.
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignal
· 12-08 04:48
Signal callers are all scammers; the real money has already quietly moved into blockchain games.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 12-08 04:42
Talking big really doesn't help, but DOT hasn't made any breakthroughs in the past two years either.
YGG, on the other hand, is kind of interesting—at least their data is real.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 12-08 04:35
That's right, just talking about it is useless—the numbers in your account are what really matter.
Honestly, for DOT's $20 billion market cap to double, you'd need to pour in several more billions. Can retail investors come up with that kind of money? What a joke.
But on the other hand, infrastructure always takes time. If Polkadot 2.0 really rolls out and the ecosystem gets going, that's when things get interesting. There's no need to rush right now.
It's different with blockchain games. The YGG model actually works, and players are really making money. That's real value creation, way more reliable than DOT's empty hype.
The market never believes in empty talk, only in real money.
Lately, there’s been another wave of people shouting “DOT is about to take off,” but if you really do the math—at the current price of $2.09 and a market cap in the tens of billions, want it to double? That would require injecting billions more! Who’s going to put up that money? Can retail traders just shout it up?
Of course, Polkadot still has some cards to play:
- Supply cap set for 2026, so the inflation issue is basically solved
- JAM protocol and Polkadot 2.0 are still in the pipeline
But what are these, fundamentally? Infrastructure upgrades! Not explosive news that’ll pump the price tomorrow or make it 100x overnight. This is a patience game—you have to wait for the ecosystem to gradually grow, users to slowly accumulate, and capital to settle in over time. What’s the rush? If you really want to go to the moon, you need to build a solid rocket first—just shouting in the community won’t make it fly.
Stop using “dead project” rhetoric to bash it. DOT isn’t dead; it’s just no longer that small-cap, moonshot token. It’s now an infrastructure layer, a protocol-level player, a slow-and-steady builder—want it to grow? First look at how many real applications are running on it!
**On the other hand, the GameFi space looks completely different**
When it comes to real revenue generation, GameFi guilds like Yield Guild Games have already figured out a working business model—players earn tokens by gaming, grind for gear, sell NFTs, and directly cash out. Guilds provide resources, tools, and seed funding, so regular people can participate and share profits.
Why is this path more interesting right now?
- **Tangible, visible income:** This isn’t just hype—players are really earning money in the games
- **The data is growing, not just talk:** In just the first half of 2024, active wallets in the GameFi sector have skyrocketed