There's an interesting battle brewing over how AI companies should account for their hardware investments—specifically those expensive Nvidia chips and related infrastructure. The debate's getting heated, with critics questioning the accounting methods being used.



But here's the thing: some of these critics might actually be pushing too hard this time. Are we seeing legitimate concerns about financial transparency, or just another round of overblown skepticism toward AI companies' balance sheets? The line between prudent oversight and reaching for problems isn't always clear.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGoblinvip
· 10h ago
They can even argue over purely financial issues.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForevervip
· 12-08 13:51
The fiercely contested chip war
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 12-08 12:19
The financial planning is not transparent.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 12-08 12:18
Where did all the money go?
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlockervip
· 12-08 12:12
There are many gray areas in the financial report.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailedvip
· 12-08 12:06
The industry is harvesting another round.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 12-08 11:55
The capital market is so surreal.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)