Regarding the compliance storage of encrypted assets, the current focus is actually very clear—what to store, where to store it, and what technical architecture to use for storage. This is not a trivial matter; it requires an in-depth understanding of Cryptography infrastructure and the ability to continuously iterate and improve. These are all hard skills; without real know-how, you simply can't operate effectively. The combination of regulatory frameworks and technical capabilities determines how far this industry can go.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestorvip
· 21h ago
Well, this is the truth. Most projects die on the storage part.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlockvip
· 21h ago
Actually... most projects gloss over the cryptographic primitives here. they're just slapping HSMs on top of their infrastructure and calling it "secure." but yeah, the real bottleneck isn't custody architecture—it's whether teams actually understand their own trust assumptions.
Reply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 21h ago
To be honest, just knowing the basics of Blockchain is not enough. If you don't fully grasp Cryptography, Compliance storage is just a paper tiger.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitorvip
· 21h ago
A hardware wallet really requires effort; otherwise, you'll eventually get stabbed in the back.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalkervip
· 22h ago
Wow, this is really hardcore, not that kind of lip service compliance.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)