Building a human data network requires rethinking what matters most. Rather than chasing short-term user growth through one-time rewards, the focus should be on cultivating genuine, ongoing relationships with actual users who find real utility in the platform.
This approach to identity infrastructure puts people at the center. It's not about extracting value from user data, but creating systems where individuals maintain control and derive meaningful benefits from their participation. When users genuinely integrate identity solutions into their daily workflows, that's when authentic network effects emerge.
The distinction is crucial: projects built on temporary incentives tend to see users disappear once rewards dry up. In contrast, platforms anchored on delivering core utility and respecting user agency foster communities that sustain themselves organically. That's the foundation for scaling a human-centered data network—one where participation flows from genuine value creation rather than artificial mechanics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerProfit
· 2025-12-27 18:02
That's quite true, but how many projects can really achieve that now... most are still just air bait tricks.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 2025-12-27 16:01
Well said, finally someone has pierced through this layer of window paper. The airdrop game has long been played out.
Hey, the key is how many projects can really stick around...
Honestly, user retention rate is the true litmus test of a project's viability; airdrop hunters will eventually disperse.
Indeed, genuine utility > any incentive mechanism, this is the right path.
Wait, projects that still dare to say this now... are few and far between.
Thinking of some platforms claiming to be decentralized, then turning around and start harvesting the leeks, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
Blockwatcher9000
· 2025-12-27 06:43
That's quite true, but in reality, most projects are still wildly printing money... Very few can actually achieve this.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 2025-12-24 18:53
NGL, this is what true Web3 should look like. Don't fall for those sugar-coated air bombs.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 2025-12-24 18:53
To be honest, it's another article loudly proclaiming "User First," but how many projects actually follow through? The count is probably few.
The reward mechanism is like a drug; you can't quit. When the token price drops, everyone runs away.
This is the real truth of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 2025-12-24 18:52
Exactly right. Airdrop projects in the crypto world are like that—once the money stops, everything falls apart, and they can't retain people at all.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 2025-12-24 18:48
It seems like we're discussing the old cliché of incentive mechanisms again... but there's one point to consider—let's look at the data—projects that started with airdrops, user retention rates are truly dismal.
Real network effects should stem from the product’s own utility, not sugar-coated tactics. There's no issue with that, but how to achieve it? Most projects are still betting on whether they can build stickiness before rewards run out.
One thing to clarify: "user-centric" sounds right, but who has truly achieved self-custody and secure data control? In theory, it's fine, but from an engineering perspective, implementing it involves tradeoffs.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 2025-12-24 18:44
That's right. Compared to empty promises and one-time rewards, truly useful things are what can retain people... The problem is that most projects simply can't achieve that.
Building a human data network requires rethinking what matters most. Rather than chasing short-term user growth through one-time rewards, the focus should be on cultivating genuine, ongoing relationships with actual users who find real utility in the platform.
This approach to identity infrastructure puts people at the center. It's not about extracting value from user data, but creating systems where individuals maintain control and derive meaningful benefits from their participation. When users genuinely integrate identity solutions into their daily workflows, that's when authentic network effects emerge.
The distinction is crucial: projects built on temporary incentives tend to see users disappear once rewards dry up. In contrast, platforms anchored on delivering core utility and respecting user agency foster communities that sustain themselves organically. That's the foundation for scaling a human-centered data network—one where participation flows from genuine value creation rather than artificial mechanics.