Onchain: Fall is upon us*

*at least in my hemisphere.

Whether it'll also be the fall of civilization remains to be seen. But if we learned anything from history books, decline tends to be a process, not a flashy moment. Speaking of not being flashy...

####Story One

###Low risk, low fun

In his latest blog post, Vitalik drops new copium for the Ethereum community, explaining why we're still not widely adopted. His answer is that we've not had enough low-risk DeFi

You might wonder, wait, isn't that an Oxymoron? And you'd be right. Nevertheless, Vitalik believes that this area could become the Google Search, the one thing that'll allow Ethereum to monetize its blockspace better than memecoins could ever

Low-risk DeFi covers exciting use cases such as payments, savings, and fully collateralized lending. Until now, most low-risk DeFi has focused on providing people with access to the US dollar through stablecoins, but Vitalik hopes this will change

Takeaway: This framing overlooks the economic conditions of the normies they are trying to onboard. Most of whom don't think crypto is low-risk at all, and if they touch it, it better be worth it (4% yield when my butter price has increased by more than that, doesn't entice me)

Pinterest####Story Two

###Hyperliquid gets its own stablecoin

Staying with the theme of stablecoins: on Hyperliquid in the last few weeks, a fight has broken out over who gets to hold the prestigious USDH ticker. ICYMI, Hyperliquid is the hottest decentralized perpetual exchange (you can trade options contracts there), complete with a native Layer-1

While it has received a fair share of criticism for not being open-source, users didn't care, and within 18 months, the chain now makes $120 monthly revenue

The one thing that was missing: a native stablecoin. Circle, the issuer of USDC, parked $5 billion on Hyperledger, and others, like Paxos and Ethena, threw their hat in the ring to be awarded the USDH ticker

In the end, a community vote decided that Native Markets would be awarded the prize, a team with ample experience on Hyperliquid, whose proposal included giving 100% of the yield generated through their reserve to the ecosystem. The yield in this case will come from holding U.S. Treasuries—a nice scheme to take from the state and give to a crypto ecosystem

Takeaway: Hyperliquid has become too big to ignore, and now everyone wants a piece of the cake

####Story Three

###Bitcoiners not amused

For anyone into drama, the Bitcoin forums are a great source of entertainment. The most recent in-fighting concerns the Bitcoin Core developers' decision to remove the OP_Return limit for non-monetary data embedded in the Bitcoin blockchain

Currently, this op code limits attachments to blocks to a size of 80 bytes. This'll soon change despite the proposal being hugely unpopular with the community. Anyone who has ever spent time with Bitcoin maxis will know why: they love Bitcoin and want to protect its purity as a digital gold

Yet in this case, it's about more than that. It's also about safeguarding Bitcoin's status as a decentralized ledger, where the entry point for running a node is relatively low compared to other Layer 1s

CointelegraphTakeaway: Emoji governance has failed the Bitcoiners. That can't be good. I've also found that the biggest insult Bitcoiners have is labelling someone or something "fiat". Try at your own discretion

Fact of the week: Since I brought up butter as the RWA I care about... Did you know that butter was even used as currency in the 11th century? In Norway, King Svein Knutsson, a butter lover, demanded that people pay taxes in the form of butter. A clever tactic I might have to adopt for my client work

####Naomi for CoinJar