How did previous chains collaborate? It was either full network broadcasting, open order matching, or rigid execution of smart contracts—inefficient, poor privacy, and unable to express demands flexibly.

In simple terms, it means "What do you want to do?" No one knows, and "Who can cooperate?" cannot be found.

🌱 It's no longer about me sending a transaction for you to accept, but rather me saying: I want to swap a coin, borrow some money, or vote, who can cooperate?
Then the system acts like a "soul coordinator on the chain", automatically helping you find the right person and the right resources, facilitating and coordinating execution locally without disclosing privacy.

This is not "make a chain", this is rewriting the role of the chain —
Anoma is more like the "Waze" + "OpenAI" of the blockchain world: it knows where you want to go and can dynamically arrange the optimal path in real time.

📌 Summarize the key points again, paying attention to a completely new expression:

1️⃣ Not taking the old path: not relying on contract accumulation, not relying on complicated matching, directly starting from "intention".
2️⃣ Local coordination: find the "most suitable" party to collaborate privately without broadcasting or shouting.
3️⃣ Flexible and borderless: Do you want to create applications, issue protocols, or build custom logic? Anoma can handle it all.

For ordinary users, the future experience of Anoma will be like:

"I want to do X"
→ The system says "I found the most suitable counterparty and path for you"
→ You click once, and it is completed privately and efficiently.

Just like hailing a ride doesn't require broadcasting, and placing an order doesn't require grabbing it, you just express your intention, and the system behind it handles everything automatically.
This is the next generation paradigm of collaboration, called "intention-driven network," rather than "on-chain instruction."

So Anoma is really not the "chain" you think it is -
It is a "smart brain that makes the chain move."