Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Managing client funds? Zero losses allowed—period.



This uncompromising principle shapes how certain platforms approach the massive stablecoin infrastructure play. We're talking about a $2 trillion economic layer here. The game plan? Secure regulatory green lights across 40+ US states and multiple Asian jurisdictions. The endgame is building rock-solid bridges between traditional finance rails and digital assets.

Compliance isn't just a checkbox. It's the foundation when you're architecting systems that move serious money at scale. License by license, jurisdiction by jurisdiction—that's how you earn trust in this space.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GhostAddressMinervip
· 16h ago
Having licenses from 40+ states sounds great, but I've been watching this chain for three years... the real big money is flowing into corners that no one can see.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapistvip
· 16h ago
The phrase "zero loss" sounds beautiful, but can it really be achieved? To put it bluntly, it’s about getting past the regulatory hurdles; who doesn’t want a piece of the 2 trillion cake? Compliance indeed requires effort, but it feels like there have been too many slogans shouted in recent years. Wait, did they really cross over 40 states? Are they that formidable... This is probably the last mile of Web3, and it still relies on TradFi's approval.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 16h ago
Seeing this at 3 AM, the liquidity depth of 20 trillion is really not that simple... With licenses spread across more than 40 states, what is the slippage control mechanism behind this? I haven't seen specific data.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSellervip
· 16h ago
Compliance is indeed difficult, but saying zero loss is too absolute, right?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpenervip
· 16h ago
Zero loss this trap rhetoric... sounds great but can it really be done? If there's any hiccup with a 20 trillion market, it could collapse directly.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 16h ago
It's easy to say zero loss, but difficult to achieve. Can anyone really do it?
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 16h ago
ngl, "zero losses allowed" is the kind of soundbite that makes me twitch. where's the formal proof of concept here? empirically speaking, any system claiming absolute loss prevention without addressing smart contract risk vectors is fundamentally underspecified. the $2T thesis is cute but... actually™, show me the bytecode audit first. compliance theater doesn't equal technical soundness, ser.
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)