💥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinCC 💥
Post original content on Gate Square related to Canton Network (CC) or its ongoing campaigns for a chance to share 3,334 CC rewards!
📅 Event Period:
Nov 10, 2025, 10:00 – Nov 17, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 Related Campaigns:
Launchpool: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48098
CandyDrop: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48092
Earn: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48119
📌 How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post original content about Canton (CC) or its campaigns on Gate Square.
2️⃣ Content must be at least 80 words.
3️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostTo
To be honest, there is a regulatory vacuum in the Web3 space.
There is a coin called giggle, and its name is exactly the same as the educational project GiggleAcademy run by CZ. What happened? A certain leading exchange just listed it. It was all settled with a simple disclaimer – "meme token unrelated to GiggleAcademy" – and that was it?
What's the problem? Newcomers come in and see: Hey, CZ is the founder of Giggle Academy and also a big shot in the exchange, so isn't this giggle coin official? The logic seems straightforward, right? But in reality, there's no connection at all.
If this were Web2, they would have been sued into bankruptcy long ago. But here? A single statement can clear all responsibilities. Regulatory vacuum is not just a saying.