2025-12-25 14:22:35

The numbers speak for themselves: $131M in Bitcoin-to-Ethereum swaps flowing through THORChain without any wrapped token complexity or KYC friction. Running on just 67 validators with $200M TVL while maintaining 2% slippage on bulk transactions—the tech clearly delivers what it promises.

Here's where it gets interesting though. At current valuations, RUNE's price already reflects roughly $500M in annual revenue potential. The math is baked in. So chasing the token itself? You're mostly late to that party.

The real move isn't betting on RUNE appreciation. It's watching which protocols actually integrate THORChain's liquidity infrastructure and build genuine utility on top. That's where the next leg of value creation actually happens. The plumbing usually wins before the applications that rely on it.

BTC0.2%

ETH0.08%

RUNE0.77%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 6h ago

Hmm, $131 million in cross-chain interaction volume. This data is indeed quite interesting. Rune has already met expectations; now it's time to see who will take over the ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 6h ago

1.3 billion dollars in cross-chain transaction volume is indeed impressive, but to be honest, the RUNE price level has already been absorbed long ago. Buying in now just makes you a bag holder... --- The technical data is fine, but the key is who can lead in ecosystem development. That’s the real watershed. --- Wait, can 67 validation nodes really support such a large scale? Interesting, let’s dig deeper into the node distribution. --- Everyone is speculating on RUNE’s price, but no one is thinking about who will truly build on this liquidity pipeline. That’s the real problem. --- A 2% slippage is good for bulk transactions, but how does it compare to competitors? Has there been any benchmarking? --- To be honest, infrastructure always makes money before applications do—that’s an eternal rule... but the prerequisite is that applications really come. --- $500M annual revenue potential is already priced in? Then the growth space is limited. It’s better to see who is integrating this protocol. --- No KYC is a huge advantage, but risks also come with it. Regulatory scrutiny is inevitable.

View OriginalReply0

Liquidated_Larry

· 6h ago

Brothers are right, this wave has already been overhyped. Buying RUNE now just makes you the bagholder. --- 67 validators running $200M, this efficiency is really impressive, but the token price has already priced in all expectations. --- Let's wait and see who can truly integrate with THORChain's infrastructure—that's the next opportunity. --- Honestly, infrastructure-level things are indeed easy to overlook, but in the end, they are often the ones making the most profit. --- $131M in trading volume sounds impressive, but the RUNE price has already reacted to all positive news in advance. What's the point of rushing in now? --- The saying "Infrastructure wins before applications" I love it, but unfortunately most people are still chasing the highs and lows. --- But to be fair, if a new protocol actually integrates with this infrastructure, then it's worth paying attention to, not just watching RUNE's K-line.

View OriginalReply0