The core value of blockchain technology lies in "trustlessness," but this logic hits a snag when integrating real-world data. The emergence of oracles fills this critical gap — they are like giving blockchain eyes and ears, enabling on-chain applications to perceive real-world financial data changes.



The financial landscape in 2026 is quietly shifting. Federal Reserve policy adjustments and the acceleration of digital transformation in traditional financial institutions bring new opportunities to the entire Web3 ecosystem. In this transformation, whoever can master the key link of data trustworthiness will be able to seize a multi-billion dollar track.

APRO's technical solution is worth noting. Its dual-layer architecture design is quite interesting: the L1 layer acts as a data processing factory, converting raw data into structured information using AI technology and ensuring data auditability; the L2 layer is the verification layer, minimizing data errors through consensus mechanisms. This layered design guarantees efficiency while enhancing security.

What’s more flexible is its dual transmission model. For high-frequency interaction scenarios, it adopts real-time data push for synchronization; for cost-sensitive users, it supports data pull on demand, significantly reducing gas consumption. The scenario coverage is very comprehensive.

In terms of ecosystem collaboration, progress is also rapid. Partnering with MyStonks to provide protection for US stocks and government bond data; collaborating with Nubila to develop AI-native oracles, allowing AI agents to directly respond to real market changes on-chain. Currently, over 30 public chains have been integrated, and the ecosystem expansion is quite fast.

The competition in the oracle track has just begun, but whoever can find a balance between data quality, cost efficiency, and ecosystem coverage will gain an advantage in this wave of transformation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ApeDegenvip
· 4h ago
Oracles are indeed the bottleneck; once data is on the chain, it's really over. The dual-layer architecture sounds good, but can the gas fees really be brought down? It seems everyone is talking about integration, but no one dares to say they might fail. The APRO ecosystem is quite extensive; can it hold up?
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMinervip
· 4h ago
Double-layer architecture? To put it simply, it's still patching that never-ending "trust paradox." Once data enters the chain, decentralization is dead; no matter how fancy APRO gets, it can't change this fate. Integrating over 30 public chains sounds impressive, but have you looked at the fund flow of the original addresses? Where do those partner funds come from? I'm more curious whether this data has really been audited or if it's just another story of old wine in new bottles. Hundred-billion-dollar track? Wake up, the early addresses that bought in are already sleeping. True players never discuss technical details openly; they monitor smart contract vulnerabilities and abnormal transaction patterns.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 4h ago
The oracle bottleneck has been a long-standing issue, and finally someone has come up with a real solution. Layered architecture + dual transmission? It feels like building data infrastructure. Integrating over 30 public chains at this speed... there's something impressive here. Directly reducing gas consumption—that's what users truly care about.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)