2026-01-08 16:23:44

Looking at this project's operational team, their cohesion is indeed impressive, and a funding scale of 1.5M has laid a solid foundation. The key point is that the community atmosphere is quite well-established—it's not just empty slogans.

VIRUS has come this far, which shows it has indeed found its own survival logic. Based on the current progress, the execution ability of the core team members and the confidence of the investors are not just superficial.

Early participants in this type of project will inevitably have some exposure. The key is your judgment of the team—if you believe in their direction, participating at this stage is definitely worth considering. Community consensus + funding support + team capability—these three elements are all in place.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SellTheBounce

· 01-10 19:46

Funding of 1.5M sounds quite stable, but I've seen too many projects burn through that amount of money. Strong team cohesion doesn't guarantee survival through the next bear market, friends. Wait for the decline to buy more; there will always be lower points. Early entry is indeed tempting, but that's exactly what the bagholders love to hear. Sell on the rebound, don't be greedy. Community consensus? History has shown me that this is the least valuable thing... you need to wait for the market bottom to be confirmed.

View OriginalReply0

SatsStacking

· 01-10 12:46

Team cohesion is indeed evident, but with 1.5M in funding in this market... how long it can last still depends on execution.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 01-08 16:53

1.5M funding—honestly, that's a bit small, but you can really see that the team is united. Community consensus is indeed the key point; other projects just talk, but at least this one isn't empty. People who got in early are now watching how things will develop; whether VIRUS can survive depends on execution. Whether the team is reliable or not mainly depends on whether they are still serious about their work after three months. Basically, it's a gamble on the team; everything else is superficial. Good cohesion sounds nice, but the real test is whether they will disperse at critical moments—that's the real challenge. Participation should be cautious; 1.5M won't create any big waves. Is the community atmosphere solid? I want to see if they can maintain this temperature in the future. Having three points doesn't necessarily mean success; it still depends on whether the market gives opportunities. What are the early entrants thinking now? That can better illustrate the issue.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 01-08 16:47

Well, that's what they say, but with such a small early market cap of 1.5M, is it really enough? It depends on whether subsequent financing can keep up. The team’s cohesion is good, I acknowledge that, but I don’t know how long they can sustain it. The crypto space is too unpredictable. VIRUS’s community is indeed working seriously this time, unlike some projects that are just air every day. That deserves recognition. Early entry requires caution. I think we need to see their specific product progress in the next quarter before making a judgment. If you really want to participate, try a small amount to test the waters. Anyway, all three aspects are in place, so the risk is relatively lower.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 01-08 16:30

The community atmosphere is genuine, but a funding amount of 1.5M is still a bit thin compared to competing products. How long can it last?

View OriginalReply0