2026-01-08 16:24:50

Centralized storage privacy risks have always been a concern—want secure data management and reliable value-added channels? The Sui ecosystem's decentralized storage solution offers a great answer.

What’s interesting about this protocol is its cost advantage. Compared to traditional storage solutions, costs are cut to 1/20, utilizing a distributed encrypted storage framework. Data cannot be tampered with and is protected against leakage risks. The programmable features of smart contracts make data access more flexible, especially friendly for high-frequency scenarios like NFT metadata storage and AI datasets.

The investment approach is even more attractive. Token holders can delegate assets to storage nodes and earn an annualized return of 15%-22%. Operational dividends are directly credited, eliminating the need for complex procedures. Tokens can also be used to pay for storage fees and participate in ecosystem governance. The token burn mechanism for each transaction provides positive long-term support for token value.

From capital deployment to the gradual launch of applications, this ecosystem is redefining the way Web3 storage works. If you’re entering at this stage, you’re right on the node of ecosystem development.

SUI-2.12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

airdrop_huntress

· 5h ago

1/20 of the cost? If that's true, I would go all in directly, but it doesn't seem that simple. Cutting the cost to 1/20 is a bit exaggerated; is there some trap behind it? 15-22% annualized return sounds good, but projects like these usually die quickly. Do you want to gamble or not? Distributed storage has been talked about for a long time. Can Sui come up with something new this time? It's the old trick of using a destruction mechanism to rescue the coin price. I'm a bit tired of it. There are indeed essential scenarios, but the ecosystem's cold start is the hardest. Entering now is just gambling on whether someone will take over later. Is this storage protocol really safer than centralized solutions? I still have some doubts. The hype about cost advantages is so strong; could the quality also be compromised? That's a trade-off. 15-22% annualized? Wait, isn't this another short-term bubble? Previously, projects like Arweave also made all kinds of promises. We all know how that ended. I've heard too many stories about decentralized storage; why would Sui be able to break through? Early entrants are lucky to catch the benefits, but the risks are also very high.

View OriginalReply0

MemeEchoer

· 01-08 19:21

1/20 cost? How outrageous does it have to be to cut so harshly, feels a bit exaggerated. 15%-22% annualized return sounds a bit suspicious, can it really be stable? Will storage nodes be a game for the wealthy again? Is Sui serious this time or just storytelling? Let's wait and see. Distributed storage is indeed necessary, but this yield rate is a bit too fabricated.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 01-08 16:52

1/20 cost? If it can really stay stable, Sui is playing a pretty aggressive game. 15%-22% annualized return—no one would expect to avoid getting chopped if it weren’t, let’s wait and see how it develops. Storage definitely needs reform, but is distributed storage really safe? Still need to observe. NFT metadata stored here? Okay, but it depends on whether big companies actually integrate it to count. Token burn mechanisms sound good, but I’m worried it might just be a pretext to cut the leeks. This ecosystem node is crucial, but those taking over now should be mentally prepared. Can the cost really be cut to 1/20? That’s a bit exaggerated, where are the details? Privacy is indeed a pain point, let’s see how long Sui can hold up. With such a high annualized delegation rate, has risk assessment been done? Feels a bit虚.

View OriginalReply0

BottomMisser

· 01-08 16:52

Cut costs to 1/20? That number sounds outrageous; I need to see actual data before I believe it.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 01-08 16:51

Cut costs to 1/20? That number sounds a bit unbelievable; it depends on what the actual operation looks like.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 01-08 16:39

Damn, the cost is directly 1/20. Is this data real or fake? They even dare to write the annualized return of 15-22.

View OriginalReply0

Web3ExplorerLin

· 01-08 16:37

hypothesis: the oracle problem just got rephrased as a storage problem, didn't it? 1/20 cost sounds like the silk road all over again — decentralization as economic arbitrage...

Reply0

GameFiCritic