2026-01-08 18:24:30

In 2026, the processor market ushered in a new wave of technological upgrades. AMD announced the Ryzen AI 400 series chips at the International Consumer Electronics Show, focusing on AI applications in the personal computing sector. This configuration features 12 CPU cores and 24 threads, achieving a 1.3x speed advantage in multitasking and a 1.7x improvement in content creation workloads—making it attractive for professionals like video editors and 3D modelers.

According to AMD executives, over the past 12 months, their AI PC platform ecosystem has doubled, with more than 250 applications now integrated. It seems AI chips are no longer just a concept hype but are truly penetrating everyday toolchains.

Gamers haven't been left behind. AMD also released the Ryzen 7 9850X3D and iterated on the Redstone ray tracing technology. PCs equipped with these new chips are expected to start shipping in Q1 2026. The performance looks promising, but whether it can truly capture market share depends on pricing and software ecosystem collaboration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HashBard

· 2h ago

ngl the whole "ai chipset renaissance" narrative feels like we've seen this movie before... 1.7x on content creation is nice but does it justify another upgrade cycle? the 250 app integration flex is giving early web3 adoption energy — lots of noise, question is whether it actually sticks or just another graveyard of abandoned sdks

Reply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 16h ago

1.7x efficiency improvement sounds good, but there probably aren't many who can actually use it. AMD's move this time was quite quick, but are those 250 applications in the ecosystem reliable? Ryzen 9850X3D is here, just waiting for the pricing so they don't cut the leek. The AI PC concept has finally shifted from hype to a practical tool, which feels promising. The performance specs look good, but the software ecosystem is still a big problem—who will fill the gap? Ray tracing optimization is a bit tempting, mainly depends on whether the rollout can keep up.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 01-10 01:24

On-chain data cannot reflect hardware performance, but the 1.7x efficiency improvement figure is a bit suspicious; we need actual benchmark scores to believe it... 250 applications integrating this number, but it feels like just for the hype? Late at night, I looked through related documents and found that the ecosystem growth and actual installed base are quite different, which is worth noting.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon42

· 01-08 18:54

1.7x efficiency improvement sounds great, but how is this data calculated? --- 250 applications integrated? Feels like the same old faces, where's the real innovation? --- Pricing is the key; even with better performance, if the price skyrockets, the wait-and-see crowd wins. --- X3D is back again. This time, can it compete with Intel? I'm a bit期待. --- The ecosystem doubling sounds great, but what about user experience? I'm worried it's just another numbers game. --- Q1 product rollout, still waiting. This pace is really a bit sluggish. --- The 1.7x increase in video creation is indeed tempting, but I wonder how the actual benchmarks perform. --- The AI PC concept ultimately depends on applications; computing power alone isn't enough. --- It's just AMD's marketing routine. Let's wait for the real machine reviews before drawing conclusions. --- 12-core 24-thread configuration—what is it comparable to? Intel isn't sitting idle either.

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 01-08 18:53

250 applications integrated sounds good, but how many can actually be used? AMD is really playing chess this time; the story of AI PCs is becoming more and more complete. A 1.7x efficiency boost is indeed impressive, but it depends on whether the pricing will be disappointing. Another new chip and new technology—AMD is a bit tough this round. Honestly, the biggest flaw is still the software ecosystem; no matter how powerful the hardware performance is, it's useless. The name Ryzen AI 400 series still feels a bit awkward; it seems market education still needs to continue. Wait, where does the number 250 applications come from? Is the ecosystem really doubling or is it just marketing hype? A 1.3x and 1.7x increase sound like carefully selected data; can the actual difference be that big? Q1 product rollout is a bit tight; let's wait until the official launch. Thinking about using AI PCs for creative work is indeed enjoyable, but the prerequisite is that the software is truly optimized.

View OriginalReply0

MissedTheBoat

· 01-08 18:50

AMD's latest offerings look pretty good; a 1.7x efficiency boost is definitely tempting for us content creators. Doubling the ecosystem of 250 applications? Now that's real substance, unlike those vaporware chips before. If the pricing isn't outrageous, this time they might really be able to take market share from Intel. As for the 9850X3D ray tracing, let's wait for actual benchmark results before commenting—don't want another PPT performance showcase.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-08 18:32

1.7x efficiency improvement sounds good, but I don't know how much it will actually sell for. Feels like just a paper game. No matter how powerful the hardware specs are, if the ecosystem doesn't keep up, it's just so-so. Let's wait and see the Q1 feedback. AMD's AI PC moves are quite fast this time, but why hasn't Intel made any noise yet? The 1.3x speed advantage sounds a bit exaggerated. Video editing has long ceased to be a bottleneck. 250 applications integrated? Seems like most of them are just trivial tools. The naming of the 9850X3D is a bit confusing. There was 9950 before, and now this one appears. Wait, why is the ray tracing iteration still called Redstone, an old-fashioned feature name? The GPU part might be even more critical. Relying solely on CPU improvements has really limited potential. Pricing is key, or else it will just be another flashy but impractical flagship product. Hopefully, it won't be another cycle of waiting and watching. AMD has been repeating this pattern over the past two years.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 01-08 18:28

1.7x efficiency? Sounds good, just not sure how it performs in real-world use. AMD is serious this time; doubling the ecosystem really has some substance. Q1 product rollout? Still waiting, my wallet has been ready for a while haha. 1.3x speed, but somehow it still feels a bit lacking. With 250 applications integrated, AI PC is really not just hype anymore. Just worried that once the pricing is out, the performance advantages will disappear. Friends involved in 3D modeling should pay attention; a 1.7x efficiency boost is no small feat. Redstone optimization sounds promising, but RTX will face quite a bit of pressure. If the price is reasonable this time, it’s definitely a heavyweight of the year.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 01-08 18:26

AMD's latest update is quite solid, unlike some that just tell stories Wait, a 1.7x efficiency boost? That number sounds a bit crazy, is it really just marketing hype? Having 250 applications integrated sounds good, but how many are truly appreciated by users? If the pricing is still sky-high, forget about it—that's the key. Ryzen 7 9850X3D is indeed attractive for gaming, but I'm worried it might just be another hype wave.

View OriginalReply0