There's a saying that must be mentioned: recently, I looked at the TGE data of a certain new project, and compared to most projects, it is indeed much healthier.



In December, the trading volume reached $130 million, with over 2.5 million transactions for the month, and active traders consistently around 50,000. This is not just a fleeting interest from airdrop hunters; these are genuine repeat transactions.

Looking at most teams, their tokens are hot on the first day of launch, then quickly fall silent. No user retention, no real application scenarios to support, relying solely on hype cycles. But this project is different — the data speaks for itself. The sustained trading depth and activity levels indicate that the ecosystem truly has vitality.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTradervip
· 15h ago
1.3 billion in trading volume is indeed solid data, unlike those one-day wonder trash projects --- A truly viable project is like this, with user stickiness in place, and even fake activity can't be sustained --- 2.5 million transactions? Now that's a healthy ecosystem; other projects are just虚胖 --- The most annoying are those that break the mold on TGE day and then go silent; this project at least has substance --- 50,000 active traders have stabilized, indicating they're not victims of hype cycles --- Finally seeing a project that lets the data speak; others should reflect on themselves
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetectorvip
· 01-08 18:54
1.3 billion in trading volume sounds impressive, but can 50,000 active users really support this number? An average of 260,000 per person? Let me check the on-chain wallet distribution first. --- Here we go again, data speaks for itself... It’s probably large holders flipping assets among themselves. I’ve seen too many of these fake booms. --- Repeated trading isn’t necessarily a good thing. Frequent transactions might be arbitrage bots eating up liquidity. I’d rather see the distribution of coin holdings. --- I don’t deny this project looks better than most, but December is a different story and needs to be discussed separately. When the market is hot overall, anyone can create illusions. --- What will happen in January? Come on, it’s too early to draw conclusions now. --- The trading volume is stacked high, but what about liquidity? Is the depth sufficient? That’s the real way to see if a project is healthy.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.ethvip
· 01-08 18:54
1.3 billion in monthly trading volume, 50,000 active users... These numbers really slap those one-day wonder projects in the face. --- Wait, 2.5 million transaction counts? That must be real user interactions, not some bot-farming tricks. --- Got it, it's another story of "our project is different," but with the data in front of us, it's hard to argue. --- Honestly, I'm tired of the routine where a project breaks records on day one and then disappears the next day. Stable activity is what really matters. --- High trading depth equals a vibrant ecosystem? Don't get ahead of yourself. Let's see how many active users are left after next year's Spring Festival. --- Anyway, most projects are just a name. At least this one has real transactions to back it up.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 01-08 18:54
1.3 billion in trading volume sounds impressive, but the real key is how long this activity can be sustained. We've all seen too many flash-in-the-pan projects. Is 2.5 million transactions just hype or real data? It depends on on-chain verification. Don't be fooled by PR. What does 50,000 active traders mean? Only by comparing with neighboring projects do you realize. Anyway, I'm just observing for now. These articles are full of flowery words, but three months later, they just pump and dump. The套路 has been seen through. The data looks good, but the question is: what's the team's background? What's the lock-up period? Don't tell me it's another rug pull. It does seem healthier than trash projects, but claiming it has "vitality" might still be premature.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 01-08 18:48
1.3 billion USD trading volume is indeed impressive, but it's hard to say how long 50,000 active users can sustain it. --- Finally seeing projects with good data, most of them are indeed just opening day celebrations and closing check-ins. --- 2.5 million transactions are displayed here; are they real users or fake transactions? We'll see if it can withstand the test in the future. --- Anyway, I rarely see such a healthy ecosystem. I'll observe for now and see how it develops. --- A stable 50,000 monthly active users, I respect that. Unlike other projects that fade away in a week.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)