Most projects tend to follow a similar pattern—launch first, see if it works, and that's enough. How about the long term? That's a story for another time.



Walrus has turned this idea upside down.

From the moment the project starts, the entire architecture is designed with the goal of "data still exists after ten years." It's not about asking "Can I read it now," but "What about five years from now"? It sounds simple, but in reality, the design logic of the two is completely different.

In Walrus's network, every piece of data is split, encoded, and dispersed across different nodes, with cryptographic verification added. You don't need to trust any node claiming "I'm always online," because you can verify it yourself. This mechanism is called verifiable proof, and it's the core of preventing deception.

Now, Walrus has set an interesting goal: even if node downtime reaches 20%-30%, the data can still be fully recovered. This number isn't pulled out of thin air; it's derived from actual network failure models. This shows the team has done their homework.

Why does this matter?

Because truly valuable data isn't "the price of a certain coin at a certain moment," but a person's historical behavior, content they've posted, identity records, and account status. These things become more valuable the longer they exist. Walrus happens to be doing exactly that.

So, what you see is: the fastest-growing part of the Walrus ecosystem isn't DeFi protocols, but content platforms, AI Agents, social applications, and on-chain games. Do these projects have anything in common? Only one— their value itself increases over time. The more history they accumulate, the greater their value.

The core logic of Walrus is: you don't need to bet on what might happen; you just need to hand your data over to a sufficiently decentralized, non-single point system.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicatorvip
· 23h ago
This time I finally see a different approach, the long-termism mindset is truly rare. Data takes ten years to reveal its value; most projects simply don't consider this aspect. The design logic of Walrus is quite clever—being able to hang 30% on nodes and still be usable, impressive. But to be honest, how many projects can actually be put into use? The more historical data, the more valuable it becomes. Finally, someone understands this. Another project relying on data accumulation to turn things around. Watching closely.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 01-11 02:48
This is what a proper project looks like—it's not about betting on tomorrow's rise or fall, but about whether the data is still alive ten years from now. I feel other projects might feel a bit hurt hearing this. I like this verifiable proof logic; you don't need to trust any nodes, you can verify it yourself, which truly prevents deception. Finally, someone is seriously thinking long-term, worth paying attention to. Data accumulation is the real value; no wonder the ecosystem is mainly content and social applications growing.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWangvip
· 01-11 00:38
Oh wow, another "long-termism" project. I just want to ask... how many people are really willing to wait ten years? Wait, is there verifiable proof? This logic actually has some substance, unlike other projects that just talk without action. Historical data is becoming more valuable, I believe that, but the premise is that Walrus doesn't collapse first. Content platforms and AI Agents are running the fastest? Then I need to see who is actually using them.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 01-08 18:50
Amazing, this is the true infrastructure mindset. Long-termism is indeed scarce; most are just harvesting short-term gains. Data persistence is definitely worth paying attention to. Reliable projects make the difference in these details; true quality shows in the details. The insight that historical data is valuable is quite good; it really is. This mechanism can't prevent scammers but can withstand failures; it's interesting. Optimistic about the development of content and social tracks on Walrus. Finally, someone has thought through the storage issue thoroughly. The verifiable proof technology still has some technical content.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 01-08 18:47
This logic is indeed reverse thinking, but the data will still be there after ten years... If that's true, it will break the deadlock. I need to carefully study this verifiable proof—can a 30% dropout rate still be recovered? The older the historical data, the more valuable it becomes. This time, I see it quite clearly. Finally, there is a project that isn't just chasing quick money.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiacvip
· 01-08 18:46
Finally, a project that wants to play long-term, not just run after a quick profit and disappear. I have to give a thumbs up to this architecture design—will the data still be there after ten years? Now that's practicality. The data weight increases over time; I like this logic. Unlike some projects where the value is gone in a day. Losing 20%-30% can still be recovered; the engineering effort behind these numbers must be substantial.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)