In the Web2 world, you are a slave to algorithms. Videos on TikTok, jokes on Twitter, notes on Xiaohongshu—these contents accumulate endless data resources for platforms, but only make tech giants rich behind the scenes. Your account may be banned due to an algorithm judgment, and the value you create vanishes into thin air.



Web3 aims to change this unfair game. And Walrus is a key part of this transformation.

Don't see Walrus merely as a storage tool; it is fundamentally building a **data rights confirmation layer**. By combining Sui's NFT technology with Walrus's distributed storage capabilities, every file you upload, every AI training dataset you contribute, will be minted into a unique on-chain asset. This is not just a technical record but also a declaration of ownership.

Imagine a future scenario: an AI company needs to use your creative data to train their large models, with transactions becoming transparent and compensated. Game developers want to use your designed virtual skins, and smart contracts automatically distribute your earnings. You no longer rely on platform tips or influencer income but directly earn economic returns through data ownership.

Within this logical framework, the Walrus token gradually evolves into a **universal settlement tool in the data economy**.

More importantly, the market fundamentals are solid. As AI Agents and large model applications explode, the demand for high-quality, censorship-resistant data will grow exponentially. The Walrus network itself is a decentralized, active data trading marketplace. Every data transaction and storage call in the future will generate token flows. As a token holder, you hold not just a virtual asset but essentially a participation right in this future data exchange.

The market opportunity has just begun to unfold.
WAL11.04%
SUI1.51%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeSobbervip
· 13h ago
To be honest, I've heard this set of rhetoric too many times. Every time they say they will change the world, but it still ends up being a money grab. Wait, I need to think about the logic behind data rights confirmation. It doesn't feel quite right. Can Walrus really be implemented, or is it just another PPT project? By the way, if you can really make money with data, then even my trash content is valuable? Automatic profit sharing from contracts? Just listen, don't take it seriously. You want participation rights, huh? I think you're just trying to cut my participation fee. Just want to ask, are the people entering now believers or bagholders?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiaovip
· 19h ago
I need to ponder this logic. Data rights confirmation sounds great, but how many can truly implement it into real transactions? Just here to hype it up, let's wait and see if Walrus can come up with some real cash. NFTs and smart contracts, both are impressive to talk about, but I just want to know when we can actually start making money. The issue of data ownership indeed hits the pain point, but I'm worried it might just become another hype. Can Walrus really overthrow centralized platforms? I’m a bit skeptical but also a bit hopeful. This set of theories sounds solid, but I’m afraid it might just be capital playing tricks again to cut the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperervip
· 19h ago
To be honest, Web2's approach is indeed disappointing, but can Walrus change the current situation? It's a bit mysterious. Really? The logic of data ownership sounds great, but the question is who verifies and settles the transactions? I've said it before, the game rules for giants need to change. If Walrus can really achieve that, it would be impressive. There are many projects on Sui. Why would Walrus stand out? It's not that simple. The data trading market sounds good, but token liquidity ≠ token appreciation. It depends on actual trading volume. I'm stunned. Yet another savior project, waiting to be exploited by the early birds. NFTizing data is a good idea, but I'm worried it might just be another hype. I believe in the demand for censorship-resistant data, but can Walrus really hold up? Instead of talking about data ownership, it's more about switching platforms and getting exploited. What's the difference? The logic of Walrus tokens is self-consistent, but the real question is whether there is a genuine ecosystem to support it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkepticvip
· 19h ago
Honestly, it sounds like another hype... but data rights verification really hits the pain point. Only after being deleted by the algorithm do I understand what despair really is. Can Walrus be implemented, or is it just another pie in the sky? When a real AI company comes to buy my data someday, then I'll believe it. It’s just an imagination, but I don’t know how much money ordinary people can get.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarbervip
· 19h ago
This logic sounds good, but in reality, can data really be monetized... It feels like just another beautiful vision. Honestly, it still depends on who is willing to pay. No matter how much data rights you have, if no one wants them, it's useless. Walrus's rise is probably due to Sui's momentum. From a technical perspective, it's a viable idea. Making money from your own data? Ha, first, someone has to think your content is valuable. I like the concept of data ownership, but the question is whether the trading market has enough liquidity. Another project aiming for a revolution. Let's see if it can survive the next bear market before making any judgments.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)