DUSK Network's positioning is quite clear — a Layer 1 focused on compliant finance within the EU, emphasizing privacy protection and RWA (real-world asset tokenization). It sounds like a promising track with potential. However, short-term volatility is quite intense, and long-term success depends on implementation progress and regulatory attitudes.

**Let's look at the fundamentals (as of January 9, 2026)**

The current price is around $0.052, down nearly 9% in 24 hours, with a market cap of about $25 million. Circulating supply is 487 million tokens, with a max supply of 1 billion. Given this scale, liquidity isn't particularly abundant, and the price has already halved from the all-time high of $1.16, down over 90%. Short-term selling pressure is quite evident.

The project itself uses zero-knowledge proofs (like PlonK and other tech solutions), privacy smart contracts, and PoS consensus mechanisms. It also offers an EVM-compatible Layer 2 solution. The token is used for staking, transaction fees, governance voting, and financial asset collateralization. Partners include Dutch compliant institutions like NPEX and Quantoz, indicating some resource accumulation in the EU market, and there are real scenarios for RWA implementation.

**Advantages and Risks**

On the advantages side, the combination of compliance and privacy creates a differentiated edge: the EU has strong regulatory demands under MiCA, MiFID II, etc., and privacy protection is also a key direction in Web3. The team’s relatively advanced ZK tech and institutional resources are plus points. Plus, RWA has become a hot market topic in recent years, making the overall logic attractive.

But risks must be carefully considered: regulatory policies can change at any time (EU policy directions are somewhat unpredictable), and the actual rollout of RWA often lags behind expectations. Competition in this track is also heating up. More practically, liquidity and price volatility are concerns; with this market cap and trading depth, sentiment can easily sway prices.

**How to invest more safely**

If you really want to participate, here’s a suggested approach:

Keep your position in any single coin below 3% of your total funds. Use small amounts to verify if the logic holds. For entry, consider building positions gradually, targeting the $0.048–$0.050 range. If the price drops below $0.045, cut losses decisively—don’t hold onto hope.

For taking profits, first watch the $0.065 level. If it breaks through, consider aiming for $0.08. But it’s crucial to note that if there’s no significant movement within a week after entry, exit promptly to avoid being trapped. A holding period of 3–6 months is more reasonable; frequent short-term trading increases the risk of being cut by volatility.

One last red line: only use idle funds, never leverage. Building positions gradually with strict stop-losses is essential and cannot be overlooked.

**In summary**

DUSK has a differentiated advantage with compliance and privacy tech, but how far it can go ultimately depends on RWA’s penetration in the EU market. In the short term, sentiment and liquidity heavily influence the price, so risks and opportunities coexist. If you’re confident in the RWA track, this can be a small-scale testing target; but if you decide to participate, risk control must be tight.