More and more projects are entering the storage track, but most still face a common challenge: how to truly convert storage demand into token value rather than letting it become mere air? Walrus offers an interesting solution—using two tokens to serve different purposes.



In this model, WAL focuses solely on maintaining the storage layer ledger. Users pay with WAL when they need to store data, and node operators earn WAL by staking and providing storage services. This way, the value trend of WAL is directly linked to real storage demand and won't be skewed by other on-chain activities.

SUI, on the other hand, handles the gas settlement for on-chain transactions—operations like uploading files and renewing storage require SUI for settlement, and rewards are distributed to the validators of the Sui network.

What are the benefits of this division of labor? First, WAL won't be passively diluted due to fluctuations in other parts of the Sui ecosystem; second, projects can directly leverage Sui's existing liquidity and fiat on-ramps, reducing onboarding costs for new developers.

Data also shows that the ecosystem is gaining momentum—by mid-year, over 1 billion WAL tokens have been staked, and 121 storage nodes are operating stably. The dual-token design provides the entire ecosystem with a self-regulating incentive balance mechanism.
WAL12.18%
SUI2.9%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHobovip
· 12h ago
Yo, this token division of labor is indeed interesting. Finally, a project that has figured it out.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 19h ago
The dual-token division strategy looks very clever, but honestly, it still depends on whether actual users will buy into it... 121 nodes sound like a lot, but how many can actually survive?
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueenvip
· 19h ago
This dual-token design is quite interesting. Finally, a project has figured it out—you can't mix storage needs with other garbage activities in the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
RektHuntervip
· 19h ago
Ha, finally someone has figured out the storage thing. Dual-token separation is really clever. WAL stabilizes storage demand, SUI handles gas settlement, no one drags the other down. I like this logic; at least it's not another air coin story. 1 billion WAL staked, 121 nodes running, the data speaks for itself and is quite solid. But to truly take off, it still depends on whether real users will use it... Can this incentive mechanism self-regulate? Sounds good, but I'm worried that actual implementation might be another story.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 19h ago
The dual-token design logic is indeed excellent. Separating WAL and SUI prevents them from dragging each other down, which is how storage projects should operate.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)