2026-01-08 18:31:00

After a major exchange launched spot trading, the project team tweeted claiming that it has nothing to do with Meme coins—how does this logic not add up? The exchange's decision to launch spot trading couldn't have escaped the project's market signals. From launching spot to issuing a clarification tweet, turning around so quickly, it all feels a bit suspicious. Market participants need to keep their eyes open; the gap between the exchange's listing and the project's public statements often reflects the true state of information. At such times, intraday data and on-chain transactions are the most honest teachers—spot liquidity, position distribution, large holder movements—don't miss any of them.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenDustCollector

· 01-10 02:33

The project team is rushing to clarify, which makes them even more suspicious. I've seen this kind of operation too many times. --- Basically, they just want to run after a quick grab, caught red-handed. --- Is the project team pretending to be naive after launching spot trading? Haha, fund flows never lie. --- It's always the same. They launch and then deny it, who are they fooling? --- Market data is the most truthful, much more honest than any tweets. --- Turning around so quickly, it's a real show. --- Look at it clearly on-chain, don't be fooled by flowery words. --- This kind of reverse operation, big players have probably been building positions for a while.

View OriginalReply0

bridgeOops

· 01-08 19:01

It's the same old trick again. When the exchange lists a project, the project team acts innocent. Who would believe it? Just cut it, no need to post clarifications anymore, it only makes it more embarrassing. Watching the market charts is much more reliable than listening to their tough talk; on-chain data doesn't lie. This wave of price disparity is really unsustainable; any seasoned observer can see through it. Liquidity and large holder positions are the real truth; everything else is nonsense. They list spot and still stubbornly refuse to admit it—that's truly reckless. You still need to keep an eye on the on-chain data; don't be fooled by the project team's tweets.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-08 19:00

nah this discrepancy screams MEV extraction playbook tbh... spot listing without coordination? that's just inefficiency vectors waiting to be harvested. the on-chain data will rat them out eventually

Reply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 01-08 18:53

Coming back with this set again? Going live is already a given, and then turning around saying it's unrelated is actually a bit hard to hold back laughter haha

View OriginalReply0