Ybaser

🌟 Web3 Security Guide — Protect Your Funds & Maximize Safety
by Dragon Fly Official
‍#Web3SecurityGuide
Navigating Web3 requires careful attention to security, especially when depositing or withdrawing funds. Mistakes can trigger risk controls, freeze accounts, or even put assets at risk. Here’s a structured approach to protect your funds while keeping operations smooth:
📌 Key Risks When Depositing & Withdrawing:
Transaction Limits & Unusual Patterns: Large or frequent transfers can trigger anti-fraud controls.
Card or Bank Restrictions: Unrecognized withdrawals may freeze your linked card or bank account.
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Depositing to insecure platforms exposes funds to hacks.
Phishing & Impersonation Risks: Fake platforms or wallets can steal credentials.
📌 How to Avoid Triggering Risk Controls:
1️⃣ Start with smaller transactions, gradually increasing amounts.
2️⃣ Use verified wallets and official platforms only.
3️⃣ Ensure consistent IP, location, and device usage to reduce suspicion.
4️⃣ Keep all KYC information updated and accurate.
📌 If Your Card or Account Is Frozen:
Contact support immediately with proper identification and transaction proof.
Avoid multiple retries, which could worsen restrictions.
Document every communication for quick resolution.
📌 Safer Withdrawal Approaches:
Split large withdrawals into smaller amounts to stay below risk thresholds.
Use secure, multi-factor authenticated wallets.
Monitor gas fees and platform liquidity to ensure smooth execution.
Prefer direct transfers to personal wallets rather than repeated exchanges.
✅ Summary: Always operate with caution, follow platform guidelines, and use trusted tools. By proactively managing deposits and withdrawals, you safeguard your assets while maintaining smooth access to your funds.
‍#Web3SecurityGuide

#美共和党提出美国挖矿法案 The United States Launches the "Mining Law"！Bitcoin Strategic Reserves Take a Step Forward, Chinese Mining Machines in Danger!
Trump's ambition to turn the U.S. into the "Global Cryptocurrency Capital" is gradually becoming law. On Monday, Republican Senators Cynthia Lummis and Bill Cassidy dropped a heavy bomb—the "U.S. Mining Act." This is not just a mining bill. Its underlying message is: the U.S. will not only stockpile Bitcoin but also mine it themselves; not only mine domestically but also kick out "foreign hostile forces'" mining machines. A new game around hash power, energy, and national security has begun.
⛏️ Chapter 1: Trump's "Bitcoin Dream" is Becoming Legislation
Last year, when Trump was still a presidential candidate, he announced plans to make the U.S. the "Global Cryptocurrency Capital." In March this year, he signed an executive order to officially establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve—funds from Bitcoin confiscated by the Treasury, at no taxpayer expense. Now, Lummis and Cassidy want to codify this executive order into law, along with a "Mining Bill." "President Trump promises to make the U.S. the world’s digital asset capital, and we will not back down." — Translated by Lummis, this means: this is a done deal.
🏭 Chapter 2: Mining Is More Than Just Mining
The core of the "U.S. Mining Act" is far more than just "encouraging mining." According to the bill: the Department of Commerce will establish a "voluntary certification program" to provide official endorsement for mining pools and facilities. Certified facilities must gradually phase out mining equipment made by companies associated with "foreign hostile forces." What does this mean? Currently, the global mining machine market is dominated by Chinese manufacturers (Bitmain, MicroBT, etc.). If the label "foreign hostile forces" is applied, it means: to get certified and mine legally in the U.S., you must replace Chinese-made mining machines. This is a supply chain purge in the name of "national security."
💰 Chapter 3: Bitcoin Strategic Reserve "Expansion Plan"
Lummis already reintroduced a bill in March to legalize Trump's Bitcoin strategic reserve executive order. Now, with the "U.S. Mining Act," they are taking a two-pronged approach:
Existing stock: Bitcoin confiscated by the government locked into the strategic reserve
Incremental: encouraging domestic mining to produce new Bitcoin
The goal is clear: make the U.S. a dual champion of "producer" and "reserve" for Bitcoin.
Cassidy said more straightforwardly on X: "Digital asset mining is an important part of our economy. We should conduct this business in the U.S."
🧭 Final Chapter: Lummis's "Last Sprint"
Cynthia Lummis, the most well-known "Crypto Queen" in Congress, is pushing these bills. She has championed multiple cryptocurrency laws: market structure, tax reform, strategic reserves... each one hitting the core issues. But an important background detail is that she announced last year she would not seek re-election, with her term ending in January 2027. This means she has less than a year left in her window of influence.
The "U.S. Mining Act" and Bitcoin strategic reserve legislation are likely her final major battles before stepping down.

Trump is now fighting for the US stock market. Since taking office, he may ignore other issues, but he cannot let the US stocks fall because that’s his face and his biggest bargaining chip for re-election.
So you’ll see him often use verbal threats to defend the market. Today, he created another spectacle—insisting that indirect negotiations with Iran are progressing smoothly and that an agreement is likely to be reached soon.
However, based on leaked information, it’s just diplomats from Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey passing messages between the US and Iran, telling each side their respective conditions. The media then exaggerated this as direct talks between the US and Iran.
You know Trump’s style—he always blows things out of proportion, and anyway, he doesn’t have to pay taxes.
The conditions from both sides are too far apart; a deal is simply impossible. Iran wants sanctions lifted and legal channels for oil exports, while the US wants Iran to completely abandon its nuclear program and stop supporting regional proxies.
Their bottom lines are worlds apart—can they really reach an agreement just through a few intermediaries passing messages? Dream on. Most likely, they’ll need to face each other directly.
That’s why Trump is now hinting at controlling Iran’s oil while also saying negotiations are going well—he looks like he’s going crazy. It’s actually a classic “both want and don’t want” dilemma—wanting to appear tough but not wanting to really crash the market.